The frequency of the fundamental will not necessarily match that of the overall waveform. This effectively measures the fundamental ONLY. It "demodulates" the signal with a quadrature oscillator. The strobe tuner works like, well, a strobe tuner. The bar tuner measures the average period of the waveform. The strobe tuner and bar tuner use different algorithms. You guys have any suggestions? Is anybody experiencing similar problems? I’m inclined to use the strobe but, if I do, both other tuners show me being way flat. I’m so frustrated i’m Back at the point of buying a Peterson but it sure seems like a $2500 modelor should not need this. So, I have 3 tuners on my Axe 3 and none of them agree. The FC seems happy if you are w/in 3-4 cents but that doesn’t work for me-to inaccurate. However, if I tune to the Axe linear, the FC will show me in tune as well but I am very flat on the strobe. If I use the strobe to tune (which I prefer) and tune everything “up” to that, then the other 2 tuners often show me 2 bars sharp. The linear tuner on the Axe display might show me a few cents off and the Strobe tuner shows me WAY off (maybe 5+ Cents, almost always sharp vs the other 2 tuner displays. The FC12 will show me dead center, perfectly in tune. When I strike a string to tune, I am getting 3 very different readings from the Axe strobe, the Axe linear tuner and (by far the worst) the FC12 tuner. With my Axe II, I was almost ready to buy a Peterson Strobe because I never felt the Axe 2 was as accurate as I like.īut, gloiusly, the Axe 3 has a strobe tuner! However, i’m Having problems this it. I can’t stand a guitar that’s out of tune. let me say 1st that I’m a freak about my tuning.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |